Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: AxMan ActiveX fuzzing <== Memory Corruption PoC
From: Thor <thor () hammerofgod com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:47:41 -0700
You misunderstand. I wasn't "bitching" about anything. I was simply noting the truth about how disclosure really works, what it is, and what it does. I don't have any actual "position" about it one way or the other. While I know it is fun for us to poke back and forth, don't let your predisposed attitude towards me cloud your interpretation of what I write. I fully review everything you post with an open mind (as I did with the GPG key issues) before replying. What exactly are you pointing out here? I'm curious to know exactly what you think my stance was. Just to be clear, I hope you understand that I could not care less if someone goes about FD. I wouldn't care even if it were regarding a bug in my own tools. I was all about "intent" not "action." Seriously, what do you think I was saying? Oh, and P.S. I actually like the "satanic writer" bit - that made me LOL. I think you (and many others) will be quite surprised to see what my next book is about. Syngress and I have all but signed the contract. Dare I say YOU may even buy it. That's too much. Dare I say YOU may even steal it of BT. :) t On Aug 1, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
Dear Thor, satanic writer, weasely The ubisoft bug in this thread hit Theregister. Won't you please bitch about "Responsible disclosure" again?
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: AxMan ActiveX fuzzing <== Memory Corruption PoC Carlo Di Dato (Aug 01)
- Re: AxMan ActiveX fuzzing <== Memory Corruption PoC Giles Coochey (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AxMan ActiveX fuzzing <== Memory Corruption PoC Georgi Guninski (Aug 01)
- Re: AxMan ActiveX fuzzing <== Memory Corruption PoC Thor (Aug 01)