Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Possibility to exploit bash "*" processing
From: Kirils Solovjovs <kirils.solovjovs () kirils com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:29:11 +0300
Brought this up a year ago. Seems that no attention has been given to this so far. See this screenshot for PoC: http://02.lv/f/2010/08/05/poc-launums.png here's a non-destructive PoC: http://02.lv/f/2010/08/05/poc-*.png One solution would be to modify "*" processing so that it ignores filenames that start "-" similarly as it ignores filenames that start with "." Or we could just train users to always type "--" before the list of arguments. :) -- Kirils Solovjovs _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Possibility to exploit bash "*" processing Kirils Solovjovs (Sep 20)
- Re: Possibility to exploit bash "*" processing Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 20)
- Re: Possibility to exploit bash "*" processing GloW - XD (Sep 20)
- Re: Possibility to exploit bash "*" processing Cédric Jeanneret (Sep 21)
- Re: Possibility to exploit bash "*" processing Jacqui Caren (Sep 21)
- Re: Possibility to exploit bash "*" processing Dan Carpenter (Sep 21)
- Re: Possibility to exploit bash "*" processing Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 21)
- Re: Possibility to exploit bash "*" processing Andrew Farmer (Sep 21)
- Re: Possibility to exploit bash "*" processing Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 21)
- Re: Possibility to exploit bash "*" processing Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 21)
- Re: Possibility to exploit bash "*" processing Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 20)