Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 01:08:48 -0500
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Antony widmal <antony.widmal () gmail com> wrote:
Dear Dan, Impacket was at first a Pysmb copy/update from Core Security in order to play with RPC. (look at the source) They've done some work on pysmb library in order to implement DCE/RPC functionality in this dinosaurus lib.
You can also try Dave Aitel's SPIKE.
This vulnerability is about sending a *huge fucking* stream of UDP packets on a closed port in order to trigger a int overflow via a ref count. Most of the people here didn't even understand what we are talking about/dealing with.
Is this related to the undisclosed MS09-048, which we were told did not require remediation because the Windows firewall (et al) mitigated the vulnerability? http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS09-048.mspx. Jeff _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516), (continued)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 10)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Jon Kertz (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Ryan Dewhurst (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Mario Vilas (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Thor (Hammer of God) (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Ryan Dewhurst (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) xD 0x41 (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Antony widmal (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Dan Ballance (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Antony widmal (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Jeffrey Walton (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Antony widmal (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Dan Ballance (Nov 13)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Mario Vilas (Nov 12)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Darren Martyn (Nov 12)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) dave bl (Nov 13)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Dan Tulovsky (Nov 13)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Antony widmal (Nov 13)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) xD 0x41 (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Ian Hayes (Nov 11)