Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

[xD 0x41 <secn3t () gmail com>]

Received: from [127.0.0.1]
(host86-160-211-44.range86-160.btcentralplus.com. [86.160.211.44])

to bad eh...



On 12 November 2011 13:42, baqstabz <baqstabz () gmail com> wrote:
> Judging by your posts I would go out on the edge and say that you have about
> as much chance of having 0-day (yes, that is including xxs) as your mommy.
> face it lol
>
> Now please, stfu son, you're sounding like a total tardlump; otherwise we
> will have to unleash the dragons and let you see what a 10k botnet feels
> like.
>
>
> On 11/11/2011 23:26, xD 0x41 wrote:
> > Indeeed.
> > Seeing how the wolves are, i ceertainly would bnot release it.
> > i am only saying, I am using cpp, and windows, and, the exploit
> > bypasses all protections, but, since you guys dont have the actual
> > real poc for it, i guess, i would not be saying anything more, and,
> > ill be leaving it, for the proper poc author, to make that choice,
> > wich, personally, i would never handout to a bunch of disrepectful
> > people, as i see, when this is, nothing, i habve held onto, atleast 2
> > GOOd MS 0days for years, you rally think, i will handout the right way
> > todo this ?
> > pfft..   yer right, lets go hand everyone the ms bug :PP ofc, why
> > would i ever not want a 10 k botnet up in a day...  hell yea!
> > i would neverm, give more about this, on this topic, because, i have
> > seen how people are now on this list and, saddens me that half of you
> > do not have a brain. unfortunately..and, saince i dont wish to break
> > any deals made with ms etc, then, i cannot say anything, i dont know,
> > why this is hard to understand..and, i will NOT handout a working
> > scanner, regardless...
> > and, believe it, it does NOT take 49days atall to exploit... theres
> > alot, you dont know..yet.
> >
> > dont ask me further, please.
> > i should never have even said anything, again, i wont make that
> > mistake again, the proof, will as always be n the pudding...
> > later.
> >
> >
> > On 12 November 2011 10:17, Michal Zalewski<lcamtuf () coredump cx>  wrote:
> > > > next time, i wont say shit, and, believe it.
> > >
> > > Well it's just that the attack you are describing will be thwarted by
> > > setting a sticky bit on /tmp, and you have not demonstrated otherwise.
> > >
> > > /mz
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/