Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Python ssl handling could be better...
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:09:35 -0500
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:39:49 EST, Charles Morris said:
I've had this conversation at many different times with different people over the years. <snip>If you tell a lie enough times.....
Took long enough to Godwin this thread. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Charles Morris (Mar 02)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Tim (Mar 02)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Charles Morris (Mar 02)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Tim (Mar 02)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Charles Morris (Mar 07)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 08)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Charles Morris (Mar 02)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Tim (Mar 02)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Charles Morris (Mar 02)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... bk (Mar 02)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Marsh Ray (Mar 03)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Jeffrey Walton (Mar 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Michael Krymson (Mar 04)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... bk (Mar 04)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Marsh Ray (Mar 04)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... dave b (Mar 04)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Marsh Ray (Mar 07)
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better... bk (Mar 04)