Re: POC for a simple gmail/possible code injection into html wich can be executed in an email, i will make the PoC code and explain how here and now...

[Haxxor Security <h () xxor se>]

How does this effect the recipient of the email? All your so called POCs
looks like ordinary links to me. Or does it only effect the sender?

2011/6/12 -= Glowing Doom =- <secn3t () gmail com>

> done.. bye!
>
>
>
> On 12 June 2011 13:12, -= Glowing Doom =- <secn3t () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > Yet i now stop... enjoy your pathetic,useless luist.. i will now
> > unsubscribe :)
> > thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12 June 2011 13:09, -= Glowing Doom =- <secn3t () gmail com> wrote:
> >
> > > Here again....
> > >
> > > I will write a sentence now, and, i will just copy, so it is 'darkened'
> > > text , then with NO backspace just leave the text darkened, and goto 'link'
> > > , and enter a link.. the text will turn to red.
> > >
> > >
> > > (this is the easiest way to reproduce it...) <http://www.haxxor-NOT.bs>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12 June 2011 13:07, -= Glowing Doom =- <secn3t () gmail com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I should have said just 'copy, then hit link... because the other one,
> > > > is actually VERY hard to explain..but yes... backspace... has a bug with
> > > > emails. Is this so hard for 500000 ppl to understand ?
> > > > I am really shocked at the brubbish talk i have copped from this.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12 June 2011 13:06, -= Glowing Doom =- <secn3t () gmail com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Do the research... then call yourself a 'team'...please :s
> > > > >
> > > > > The PoC, is easy as hell to reproduce. I am shocked a team, cannot do
> > > > > it..
> > > > >
> > > > > even the easy one wich is just copy/backspace, and, hit link and enter
> > > > > a link!
> > > > > simple ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12 June 2011 12:52, Haxxor Security <h () xxor se> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > As I (painfully tried to) understand it, secn3t can fool his own email
> > > > > > client to create malformed links by pressing backspace...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2011/6/12 adam <adam () papsy net>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > At the end of the day, you're going to be treated like a child as
> > > > > > > long as you continue to type like one.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The entertaining part for me is how each of your replies contradicts
> > > > > > > a previous one. According to you, this *vulnerability* *has existed
> > > > > > > for years*. And also according to you, the reason why the original
> > > > > > > email was filled with spelling errors is because it *was rushed out
> > > > > > > due to you being "awake" at 6AM.* Do you see the inconsistency
> > > > > > > between those two statements? Your response to Christian also indicated that
> > > > > > > you* **didn't just discover this*.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > IF this is an old vulnerability and IF you've known about it for an
> > > > > > > extended period of time - WHY did you have to post it right when you did?
> > > > > > > It's old, you've known about it for a while, it's existed for years, yet it
> > > > > > > couldn't wait until later in the day? It couldn't wait until you had time to
> > > > > > > skim over the email and correct any spelling/grammar mistakes? It absolutely
> > > > > > > had to be posted right then and there?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:14 PM, -= Glowing Doom =- <
> > > > > > > secn3t () gmail com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thats why i the people who do understand it, can see that it is
> > > > > > > > there... yes, VERY hard to expalin, id LOVE to see you try.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 12 June 2011 12:11, adam <adam () papsy net> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Furthermore, pretending that we [the readers] are somehow at fault
> > > > > > > > > here (for not understanding) isn't going to get you very far. The only thing
> > > > > > > > > consistent in this entire thread is that people *kind of* want to
> > > > > > > > > know what you're talking about, but aren't able to due to the poor writing
> > > > > > > > > style and spelling/grammar errors.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It should be noted that no one is being anal about typos, I fully
> > > > > > > > > understand that people make mistakes. The difference is that it appears you
> > > > > > > > > didn't even so much as proof read the original email.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:04 PM, phocean <0x90 () phocean net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi n3td3v... oops!... secn3t (that is close),
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Sorry but I don't understand anything to this thread.
> > > > > > > > > > Each of your emails is such a pain to read, that I stop at the
> > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > sentence.
> > > > > > > > > > We are all busy and don't want to take 20 min to decipher your
> > > > > > > > > > writing
> > > > > > > > > > with the risk that it is not deserving it.
> > > > > > > > > > Please clarify and give consistent technical facts.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Le 12/06/2011 03:33, -= Glowing Doom =- a écrit :
> > > > > > > > > > > This is NOT coded..  the PoC i am explaining, is possible with
> > > > > > > > > > simply
> > > > > > > > > > > copyying text,then using a sequence of keys, to make the actual
> > > > > > > > > > > sentence/s, appear.
> > > > > > > > > > > This code is not what shows up when it is dissected.
> > > > > > > > > > > It shows up with many x41 all over the email when it is done
> > > > > > > > > > properly .
> > > > > > > > > > > Regards.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 12 June 2011 11:29, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429 () gmail com
> > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:uuf6429 () gmail com>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >     For those lazy enough to search:
> > > > > > > > > > https://www.owasp.org/index.php/The_CSRSS_Backspace_Bug_still_works_in_windows_2003_sp1
> > > > > > > > > > >     Excerpt:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >     Basicaly just compile this and you will get a 100% processor
> > > > > > > > > > usage
> > > > > > > > > > >     by the compiled exploit and Csrss.exe
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >     #include <stdio.h>
> > > > > > > > > > >     int main(void)
> > > > > > > > > > >     {
> > > > > > > > > > >     while(1)
> > > > > > > > > > >     printf("\t\t\b\b\b\b\b\b");
> > > > > > > > > > >     return 0;
> > > > > > > > > > >     }
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >     How this helps in sending spam is beyond me.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >     On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Jeffrey Walton <
> > > > > > > > > > noloader () gmail com
> > > > > > > > > > >     <mailto:noloader () gmail com>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >         On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:06 PM, -= Glowing Doom =-
> > > > > > > > > > >         <secn3t () gmail com <mailto:secn3t () gmail com>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >         > It is now, over 1yr old atleast and exists in
> > > > > > > > > > riched20.dll.
> > > > > > > > > > >         > This PoC info is over for me also.
> > > > > > > > > > >         Microsoft had problems with a backspace in the past.
> > > > > > > > > > Search for
> > > > > > > > > > >         "CSRSS
> > > > > > > > > > >         Backspace Bug".
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >         > [SNIP
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >         Jeff
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >         _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > >         Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > > > > > > > >         Charter:
> > > > > > > > > > http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > > > > > > > > >         Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > > > > > > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > > > > > > > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > phocean
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > > > > > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > > > > > > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > > > > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > > > > > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > > > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/