Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: POC for a simple gmail/possible code injection into html wich can be executed in an email, i will make the PoC code and explain how here and now...


From: "-= Glowing Doom =-" <secn3t () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:06:47 +1000

This is why i was trying to say, it is hard to re make it and explain it ,
in the first post.
It is now, over 1yr old atleast and exists in riched20.dll.
This PoC info is over for me also.
I do not think I will be posting anything to this list, ill watch and learnm
from those who seem to have the knowledge about this and could help with
it... It does exist, and, it is a client side problem, however, it seems to
be accepted by gmail... I used gmail, as the PoC mail-to.
Sorry for sharing :s sheesh.


On 12 June 2011 11:04, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429 () gmail com> wrote:

As Adam said, I'll actually read this when it's been properly analysed.
If it actually does exist, eventually someone will explain it more
formally.
Until that time, the discussion ends here for me.




On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:59 AM, -= Glowing Doom =- <secn3t () gmail com>wrote:

Grow up? Jesus fucking christ you think people here care about some
half-assed crap you think you just dug up?

Just dug up ?? I doubt it.. more like, new to the list.

And finally, how does Thunderbird, Outlook relate to Gmail?
Regarding the dll, so it's first a dll-hunt in those 20+ dlls each of
those programs load up and now it's all about an RTF editing dll?
Then let's get back to the POC, which happens to be two crappy links,
which for some reason you'd believe wouldn't normally show up in an
email....?

Gmail, was the example mailing system i used.. as ive stated the bug is a
DLL problem.
have a nice day sir!



On 12 June 2011 10:56, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429 () gmail com> wrote:

Grow up? Jesus fucking christ you think people here care about some
half-assed crap you think you just dug up?
We're all busy and you expect some one would go out of his way verifying
(or not) what you think you've found?

Here's a crazy though, grow up yourself and put your findings in a well
written format, English or not.
If you can't help your spelling mistakes get a decent browser and stop
using lynx for the lulz.

And finally, how does Thunderbird, Outlook relate to Gmail?
Regarding the dll, so it's first a dll-hunt in those 20+ dlls each of
those programs load up and now it's all about an RTF editing dll?

Then let's get back to the POC, which happens to be two crappy links,
which for some reason you'd believe wouldn't normally show up in an
email....?


On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com>wrote:

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:45 PM, adam <adam () papsy net> wrote:
Somehow, I seriously doubt that.
The point is, broken English or not - this has to be the most
laughable PoC
I've ever seen. He originally insists that this is a problem related
to (web
based?) mail providers (which would lead anyone to believe is server
related) and then turns around and begins referencing external
libraries
(that he can't even name?).
Lastly, before diving face first into his ass - you should have
probably
performed a Google search. I'll give you a hint, he's not located in
some
third world country.
Too funny.... Location is distinct from native tongue.
http://www.collegehumor.com/video/5817726/internet-bridge-troll

Jeff

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com>
wrote:

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:13 PM, adam <adam () papsy net> wrote:
When the English version becomes available, please let me know.
I'd bet secn3t's english is better than your speaking his native
tongue....

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:02 PM, -= Glowing Doom =- <
secn3t () gmail com>
wrote:

Systems wich appear vulnerable: EVERY single one i have tried...

How:

I wrote that sentecne, then, i backspaced it and blacked it over
with
copy
, then, enter url to wherver i want...
There is 3 ways i have found todo this, when i dissected one of
them,
the
URL/Sentence, was gfull of x41\x41\x41 , very strange... because
it is
still
able to be done 3 ways, and the simplest way does NOT require even
html
'link' to section, wich is what MST be done, altho on older
emailer
systems,
I see that it is simple as backspace over the sentence,then type
the
url, it
a'appears' at first , to be a normal deleted sentence, but when I
open
and
dissect, it shows URL/41/41/41 then all over the email page, same
thing
...
I know this might be confusing,  I traced the problem to a dll or
lib
wich
is for text editing , and that dll is a VERY common one on any
system,
sofar
not one mailing system, has NOT had this vuln... yet, i have seen
another
'version' of this attack type, but, they can ONLY spoof a URL...
This
one,
you can make the whole email, a url... i will do this right now..

[SNIP]

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/




_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread: