Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: newest category of security bugs considered elite ?
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 12:30:28 +1200
Dan Kaminsky wrote:
I really like the hash length declaration bugs, where the client can tell the server how many bytes of a hash need to be validated. (Yep, you just say "one byte is plenty") SNMPv3 and XML-DSIG both fell to this, catastrophically.
I thought Georgi asked for the newest class of elite vulns? Does (at least) ten years old count as new? http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms00-072.mspx And against Win9x count as elite? 8-) FWIW, MS00-072 was fairly widely exploited in the wild by at least the Opaserv (aka Opasoft) family of worms, though not until a couple (?) of years after the bulletin's release. Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- newest category of security bugs considered elite ? Georgi Guninski (May 01)
- Re: newest category of security bugs considered elite ? Dan Kaminsky (May 01)
- Re: newest category of security bugs considered elite ? Nick FitzGerald (May 01)
- Re: newest category of security bugs considered elite ? Don Bailey (May 01)
- Re: newest category of security bugs considered elite ? Dan Kaminsky (May 01)
- Re: newest category of security bugs considered elite ? Nick FitzGerald (May 01)
- Re: newest category of security bugs considered elite ? Nick FitzGerald (May 01)
- Re: newest category of security bugs considered elite ? Dan Kaminsky (May 01)
- Re: newest category of security bugs considered elite ? Thor (Hammer of God) (May 01)
- Re: newest category of security bugs considered elite ? coderman (May 01)
- Re: newest category of security bugs considered elite ? Marsh Ray (May 04)
- Re: newest category of security bugs considered elite ? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 04)