Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability
From: Marsh Ray <marsh () extendedsubset com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 00:35:43 -0500
On 5/14/2010 12:16 AM, paul.szabo () sydney edu au wrote:
Dear Henri,Have you requested CVE-identifier for this?No, sorry, do not know how to do. Was hoping that Wolfram would quickly (and "silently") fix the issue; otherwise maybe they can (must?) do.
I reported similar badness in some Intel tools for Linux. Their incident response has been engaged, but I don't think either of us has requested a CVE at this point. Questions for the group: A. Does anyone think there would be much gained by me requesting (or insisting on) a CVE number? B. Does anybody actually care about local escalations any more, or is everyone just expected to have their very own personal virtual private cloud for a security boundary? Thanks, - Marsh _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability paul . szabo (May 13)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability Henri Salo (May 13)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability paul . szabo (May 13)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability Marsh Ray (May 13)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability paul . szabo (May 14)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability Marsh Ray (May 15)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability Leif Nixon (May 14)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability paul . szabo (May 13)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability Georgi Guninski (May 14)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability Henri Salo (May 13)