Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: verizon vs m$
From: Dan Kaminsky <dan () doxpara com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:22:42 +0900
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:12 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 07:16:34 EST, Larry Seltzer said:2. some interpret it as a feature and some as a bug?Does it have to be either?It sounds to me as if this is a deliberate design decision, and people are disagreeing over the severity of its implications.Some people refer to that as a "feee-tchure" or "Broken As Designed". It's technically not a bug, but it does violate the Principle of Least Surprise.
To be fair, "Surprise! Nothing works" would be a little more surprising. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Fwd: verizon vs m$, (continued)
- Message not available
- Fwd: verizon vs m$ Ven Ted (Dec 06)
- Re: Fwd: verizon vs m$ Thor (Hammer of God) (Dec 06)
- Re: verizon vs m$ Thor (Hammer of God) (Dec 06)
- Re: verizon vs m$ Dan Kaminsky (Dec 06)
- Re: verizon vs m$ Thor (Hammer of God) (Dec 06)
- Re: verizon vs m$ Dan Kaminsky (Dec 07)
- Re: verizon vs m$ Larry Seltzer (Dec 07)
- Re: verizon vs m$ Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 07)
- Re: verizon vs m$ Dan Kaminsky (Dec 07)
- Re: verizon vs m$ Thor (Hammer of God) (Dec 07)
- Re: verizon vs m$ Marsh Ray (Dec 07)
- Re: verizon vs m$ Christian Sciberras (Dec 07)
- Re: verizon vs m$ Georgi Guninski (Dec 08)