Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assemblycode?(Interesting security theory)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:40:20 -0500
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:23:50 MST, John Horn said:
Yeah, must have been tongue in cheek, can't imagine anyone able to understand what this list is about making such a Rube Goldberg claim as stuff like a Windows self assembling kernel and libraries etc....
Check the archives, there's been some truly dim bulbs who have wandered through here. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code? (Interesting security theory) John Jester Wilham Patrick III (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code?(Interesting security theory) John Horn (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code?(Interesting security theory) Christian Sciberras (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assemblycode?(Interesting security theory) John Horn (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assemblycode?(Interesting security theory) Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assemblycode?(Interesting security theory) Paul Schmehl (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code?(Interesting security theory) Christian Sciberras (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code?(Interesting security theory) John Horn (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code?(Interesting security theory) Randal T. Rioux (Dec 10)
- Re: Windows is 100% self-modifying assembly code? (Interesting security theory) Jhfjjf Hfdsjj (Dec 10)