Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:24:31 -0400
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:34:00 MDT, James Lay said:
Apparently MS either: a) believes that people/employees on a LAN would NEVER EVER do anything naughty or; b) that hostbased firewalls should be enabled on ALL workstations regardless if they are behind corporate firewall/nat/etc...
You do realize that (b) is a best-practices, right? You want defense in depth, because otherwise all it takes is one idiot over in Accounting to click on one image, and you win an entire box full of the Marcus Ranum "crunchy outside, soft chewy inside" firewall candy. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048?, (continued)
- Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048? Larry Seltzer (Sep 16)
- Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048? Aras "Russ" Memisyazici (Sep 17)
- Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048? Susan Bradley (Sep 17)
- Message not available
- Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048? Susan Bradley (Sep 17)
- Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048? John Morrison (Sep 17)
- Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048? Peter Besenbruch (Sep 16)
- Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048? Rohit Patnaik (Sep 16)
- Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048? Larry Seltzer (Sep 16)
- Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048? Thor (Hammer of God) (Sep 16)
- Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048? James Lay (Sep 16)
- Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 16)