Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update

From: Byron Sonne <blsonne () halvdan com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:53:23 -0400

my TV licence money isnt for paying criminals.


Bwahahaha!

You suckers have to pay for TV licenses? That's some fucked up shit.
Then again, it IS the nanny state...

-- 
     Byron L. Sonne :: blsonne () halvdan com :: www.halvdan.com
gpg: 0x69D9EAA6, C651 EF07 1298 58B3 615D 4019 E196 BAE1 69D9 EAA6

         "For Good, return Good. For Evil, return Justice"

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread:

The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Ivan . (Mar 15)
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update James Matthews (Mar 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Matt (Mar 18)
  - Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update A . L . M . Buxey (Mar 18)
    - Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Byron Sonne (Mar 18)
    - Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Stuart Dunkeld (Mar 18)
    - Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Byron Sonne (Mar 18)
    - Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Michal (Mar 19)
    - Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Byron Sonne (Mar 19)
    - Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update James Matthews (Mar 19)
    - Re: The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update Matt Olson (Mar 18)