Re: Postings

[n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>]

There has been no darkmyst on full-disclosure, you've just slipped up
and closed the gap on who you actually are.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Ureleet <ureleet () gmail com> wrote:
> o, and dont forget darkmyst.
>
> u liar.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ureleet <ureleet () gmail com> wrote:
> > > i wrote an email last week that said i will lay off of andrew.  i did.
> > >  and it seems like the list has torn him apart without me.  further
> > > echoing the sentiment that i share.
> >
> > Your nicknames
> >
> > > andrew is, in fact, a worthless air sucker..
> > >
> > > now, i know that alot of u have me going directly to /dev/null or
> > > spam, but 4 those of u that dont.
> > >
> > > heres my request:
> > >
> > > no 1 respond 2 n3td3v.  not now, not ever.  ive done my deed in
> > > further pointing out how much i h8 him, and it seems like at least
> > > 20-30 others have done so as well.
> >
> > Your nicknames
> >
> > > i saw that andrew posted that he was applying 4 mi5.  good luck.  btw
> > > -- when mi5 reviews applications, (of dropouts especially), they tend
> > > 2 do a little research.  1 of those steps is to google ur name.
> > >
> > > andrew wallace
> >
> > They know me already
> >
> > > and they will then realize that andrew wallace, is indeed n3td3v.  and
> > > u then will not have a job.  u will fail.
> >
> > Unlikely if I have intelligence they want
> >
> > > i also noticed that andrew/n3td3v said that he was leaving the list.
> > > again.  ...again...  but we all know, hell be back in a week or so, if
> > > not already.
> >
> > Still here
> >
> > > i ask that u all ignore him.  no 1 respond 2 him.  i wont, j-f, i hope
> > > u dont, biz marquee, i hope u dont.  every1, i implore u 2 please
> > > ignore him.  especially those, like j-f said, who feel that they have
> > > 2 point out (like me) what a tool he is because if we dont, then that
> > > means we accept it.  which is wrong.
> >
> > Take your own advice
> >
> > > andrew i leave u w/ this thought:
> > >
> > > i speak for @ least 30 ppl on this list.  not every1, (as u
> > > undoubtably will point out, like u do in every other fucking thread),
> > > and especially all ur aliases such as sexybitch169 or whatever ur name
> > > is.  we dont like u.  we think u have no value.  we think that the
> > > best thing u can do 4 the community is to leave.  we do not value ur
> > > opinion.  in case u havent noticed, the security community pretty much
> > > doesnt value any1s opinion!  thats it.
> >
> > Your nicknames
> >
> > Mine have only ever been:
> >
> > n3td3v
> > xploitable
> > hackthegov
> > worriedsecurity
> >
> > > u want 2 b legit?  try learning, and not regurgitating.  u post
> > > nothing of value.  we read the same stuff u do.  and those of us that
> > > havent read it by the time u do, need to step up their game because
> > > they r falling woefully behind.
> >
> > More garbage
> >
> > > c u in 10 years if u listen 2 me.  see u in 3-5 days if u dont.
> >
> > Hope not

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/