Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability
From: n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 01:21:19 +0100
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Rishi Narang <psy.echo () gmail com> wrote:
Proof of Concept: http://evilfingers.com/advisory/google_chrome_poc.php
You didn't manage to jail break the entire browser, thats whats unique about Chrome, each tab is in jail, so the entire application doesn't crash. The real elite exploits will come with you can jail break the entire Chrome application... "Chrome's architecture lends itself to secure browsing. Each Web page, or tab, runs in its own process, and is blocked from accessing other processes on the computer. "We've taking the existing process boundary," the comic says, "and made it into a jail." Different and more flexible permissions are being developed for plug-ins, however." http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10029914-2.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability Rishi Narang (Sep 02)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability n3td3v (Sep 02)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability Larry Seltzer (Sep 02)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability Rishi Narang (Sep 02)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability n3td3v (Sep 02)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability n3td3v (Sep 02)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability silky (Sep 02)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability Jardel Weyrich (Sep 02)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability silky (Sep 02)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability n3td3v (Sep 02)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability Giancarlo Razzolini (Sep 02)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability n3td3v (Sep 02)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability Rishi Narang (Sep 02)