Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: die
From: n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:33:50 +0100
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Stephen Johnson <maillists () thelonecoder com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] dieWho do you think you are, Gadi Evron or something? Don't tell people what to do.Who do you think you are, Gadi Evron or something? Don't tell people what to do.Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this address in a way that will never complete
As long as Marcus Sachs doesn't make cyber security a national security agenda as the next administration is coming in. n3td3v saw that as a real threat to other countries national security specifically the United Kingdom, and as such I am on false flag alert. I'm convinced Marcus Sachs is hungry for power in Washington to do with cyber security. I think thats what was behind his senseless domain name reportage on the Sans Dairy, he wanted to put cyber security infront of the next administration as it is coming in. He thought Gustav was gonna be a major cat 4, cat 5 hurricane and thought this is a perfect way to put cyber security infront of the next next administration as they are coming in. Unfortunately for him his postings of domain names just turned into an alert board for the cyber criminals and helped them in knowing which domains not to use in cyber attacks. Plus the hurricane ended up making landfall on the Gulf Coast as a cat 2, cat 1 hurricane, so made his attempts to artificially ramp up cyber security as a national security agenda a damp squid. Although there is a flaw in his thinking, why make something a national security agenda when it isn't one? And thats what worries me. Why not let it naturally be a national security agenda or not be a natural national security agenda, why do you need to ramp something up to be a national security agenda when it isn't one? Cyber security isn't a national security agenda, but folks like Marcus Sachs want it to be one, so he can gain control of "cyber" in Washington. This is what i'm afraid of and Marcus Sachs and whoever he is related to need to be watched closely, I seen that Youtube video as a real threat and i'm keeping a close eye on him and any future dialog he outputs into the security community and wider world. Gadi Evron is small fry in comparison to Marcus Sachs, although Gadi is power hungry and could become a national security threat, he isn't right now, the real concern is that of Marcus Sachs and the Cnet News Youtube clip that mentions he or people he has obviously been having discussions with behind the scenes are wanting to artificially ramp up cyber security in timing with Obama or McCain getting into the White House, either so Marcus Sachs or his associates can A) Grab front focus power for the next four years, B) Get funding for various "projects" they deem as important. When you've got big leaders talking about influencing the next administration as they are coming in to a bunch of folks at Black Hat 2008, it really sends alarm bells ringing, I just hope the guy is being wiretapped. Sure, Gadi Evron is power hungry, but there are bigger fish to fry... Marcus Sachs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUPTZVlkyU We need to get the full video of the Youtube video link i've post above put online, does Cnet News have the full video of the presentation? If so post it onto Youtube. Also, if Blackhat.com have the full video of the presentation, please post it online. Can everyone keep an eye on https://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-usa-08/bh-usa-08-archive.html#Sachs and email me when and if the video full appears there, we need to track this guy and keep an eye on him. If I ever get into MI5, i'll be focusing all my efforts on Sachs, so I hope the people who do work in MI5 keep an eye on Sachs in the run up to the election and beyond. Gadi is only causing collateral damage right now, by him pumping out about Estonia and Georgia being blamed on Russia and the news journalists believing that, when really both of those incidents were the work of the U.S government. The other governments can put up with Gadi's bot net claims and what appears in the media because of him, because its not really his fault unless the CIA have leaned on Mossad, to lean on Gadi Evron, to post on the internet who is to blame for Estonia, Georgia and whatever else Sachs and company may have planned to artificially ramp up cyber security as a national security agenda as the next president is coming in, (See Youtube video for Marcus Sachs quotes). All the best, n3td3v _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- die anonymous pimp (Sep 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: die william () lefkovics net (Sep 02)