Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability
From: hannibal <hannibal () switched com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:10:11 +0100
n3td3v wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Chris Pritchard <mailinglist () brainiacghost co uk> wrote:I don't think it's "your" list, and even if it was, you didn't have to be so rude about itIts Gadi Evron's list because Mossad told him to make it so. Who's really in control of the propaganda on this mailing list, Gadi Evron, he gets quoted in all the journalist articles as soon as he spams some new claim about which country is to blame for a cyber attack, and the journalists believe him, then it becomes the true version of events... even if its not really. Thats why I think its time for journalists to rethink who the "trusted" security professionals are and who is gaming the system for political outcomes, that an intelligence agency has told them to make happen. Its true that Full-Disclosure is a powerful platform, and all it needs is a couple of Gadi Evron's and Dancho Danchev's spamming what the "truth" is and everyone goes with it. I find it suspicious that Dancho Danchev was a standard blogspot blogger one week, then after about two posts on Full-Disclosure was suddenly upgraded to the Zdnet zero-day blog... splitting out more information about cyber attacks and which country is to blame. We've got to keep an eye on the so-called "trusted" security professionals now, because they are trying to game the system for a political end, the intelligence services in U.S are responsible for a number of cyber attacks, which have been blamed on other countries and entities. I post proof that Marcus Sachs wants to influence the political system in America at the highest level of government, so his group can get lots of money. So we know the mind set which is going on right now, so its not like I haven't post proof, intelligence agencies and certain "trusted" security professionals want control of "cyber" and they will do anything they can to get it. We must proceed with caution and think carefully about who is telling the truth before quoting "trusted" security professionals from now on. The Marcus Sachs Youtube video is extremely damaging for the security industry, what the true intentions are of some people and how power hungry they are. Would Marcus Sachs, Gadi Evron and Dancho Danchev etc tell a lie to become more powerful, you bet they would, especially if being leaned on by certain rogue elements of the intelligence agencies. The truth is, there are people out there looking to ramp up cyber security as a national security agenda, even though naturally cyber security is no where near being a national security issue, they still want to ramp it up anyway because it will give them power and money in an area that has yet to be decided upon. "Cyber" is like a new area, and folks are racing to become the leaders of cyber before one another, thats why its a dangerous time right now and there is lots of propaganda flying around the mailing lists as soon as a cyber attack happens, which are probably false flags anyway created by the very people who are on Youtube videos looking for ways to become powerful with lots of money. I found the Cnet news article that goes with the Youtube video, we have *some* of the people that are power hungry in the photograph thats on the Cnet News article. 'Cybersecurity commission' to proffer advice to next president http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10009603-38.html We've got to follow these people around in real life, monitor their internet connection and phone calls to see who are have discussions with, so no foul play happens because they are so desperate to impress the next administration. All the best, n3td3v
How does this pertain to the Google Chrome Browser vuln? We all know that Evron is a moronic jew, who cares? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability, (continued)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability n3td3v (Sep 03)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability redb0ne (Sep 03)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability Shyaam (Sep 03)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability redb0ne (Sep 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability Shyaam (Sep 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability Juha-Matti Laurio (Sep 04)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability Fionnbharr (Sep 04)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability Chris Pritchard (Sep 04)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability The Mad Hatter (Sep 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability n3td3v (Sep 04)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability hannibal (Sep 05)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability n3td3v (Sep 05)
- Re: Google Chrome Browser Vulnerability Fionnbharr (Sep 04)