Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?!
From: "Elazar Broad" <elazar () hushmail com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:06:48 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dan has been an exception to just about every rule, including the "you should take me seriously" rule. Not that this is a good thing, the guy is brilliant... On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:40:42 -0500 Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists () tx rr com> wrote:
--On November 26, 2008 1:59:27 AM -0600 Elazar Broad <elazar () hushmail com> wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Um, NTLM isn't the only 20 or so year old protocol to take theraprecently, I can think of a low numbered rfc, lets say 1034 and 1035. Hindsight is 20/20, and 20 years ago, who would havethoughtthat a 16 bit number was way too small for DNS transaction id,thesame "who would have though" goes for NTLM and the rest. Letsfaceit, protocol design bugs suck, and to completely replace awidelyused protocol ranks pretty high in the PiTA hall of fame...In that particular case Dan Bernstein not only *did* think about it but actually did something about it. It's just that no one else was listening. Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ****************************************** WARNING: Check the headers before replying
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Charset: UTF8 Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 3.0 wpwEAQECAAYFAkkwQUkACgkQi04xwClgpZiDIQP9FlPRrcxmuee/EiJFAAYZrAeTKvqj Lze+xlyTfWickh0JaczRYfNnho5MWAiie+jF5QjcXPJTch64hWvxm8PzjRbIqcnGGbMa dtvUk7PF7hELryWHy8CRu/WGHq5ejD3CFegdnX9HpbKD8zBXmuJdtNpSc0wwGvGcxe9z XBCqXx4= =w/u9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Click here to choose from a huge selection of the billiard accessories you need. http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/PnY6qxubm7YZMMzPW1eIA3ZOBhrMWDmFw8sLmh0HJftgy2H1YOYys/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?!, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Eric Rachner (Nov 25)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Paul Schmehl (Nov 26)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Memisyazici, Aras (Nov 25)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Charles Morris (Nov 25)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Kurt Grutzmacher (Nov 25)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Mike C (Nov 26)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Charles Morris (Nov 25)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Elazar Broad (Nov 26)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Paul Schmehl (Nov 26)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Eric Rachner (Nov 27)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Eric Rachner (Nov 27)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Elazar Broad (Nov 28)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Eric Rachner (Nov 25)