Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Save XP
From: "Tyler Reguly" <ht () computerdefense org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 05:52:23 -0500
Sometimes I'm reminded of why Full Disclosure amuses me and why I stay subscribed On 1/30/08, scott <redhowlingwolves () nc rr com> wrote:
Yes and MS quietly extended 98 for a few more years until they came out with 2000.A much better OS than ME at the time,IMHO.
Windows ME Release Date: Sept. 14, 2000 Windows 2000 Release Date: Feb. 17, 2000 Windows 2000 was out half a year ahead of Windows ME... so something tells me they didn't "quietly extend 98 for a few more years until they came out with 2000"... even if you were talking XP (which was Oct 2001) it would be a year, not a few years. Bill: You aren't being fair with our EOL dates. You are comparing XP Pro (Officially a business operating system) to Vista Home Premium (a Home operating System)... you have to compare XP Pro to a Business version of Vista and when you do that you get Vista Business with an EOL of 2017 ( http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=11707 ), 3 years after XP Pro. Tyler.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Save XP, (continued)
- Re: Save XP Steward Smith (Jan 29)
- Re: Save XP Tremaine Lea (Jan 29)
- Re: Save XP Peter Besenbruch (Jan 29)
- Re: Save XP blah (Jan 29)
- Re: Save XP dxp (Jan 28)
- Re: Save XP Linval Thompson (Jan 31)
- Re: Save XP Larry Seltzer (Jan 28)
- Re: Save XP James Matthews (Jan 29)
- Re: Save XP mgk.mailing (Jan 31)
- Re: Save XP scott (Jan 31)
- Re: Save XP Tyler Reguly (Jan 31)
- Re: Save XP Peter Besenbruch (Jan 31)
- Re: Save XP mgk.mailing (Jan 31)