Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!!
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:32:30 -0500
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:13:48 EST, "Randal T. Rioux" said:
OpenVMS is less than 40% Blissful...
Obviously, it's migrated over the years. Back in the late 80's when it was at its most prevalent (and before it got 'Open' attached to it - we're talking Big Grey Wall and Big Orange Wall era here), it was pretty heavily Bliss32..
Security relevance: UNHACKABLE! <grin>
WANK! (The old-timers will know what that means, and it's not what you newbies think... ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!! Randal T. Rioux (Jan 02)
- Re: Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!! Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 02)
- Re: Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!! reepex (Jan 02)
- Re: Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!! Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 02)
- Re: Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!! Dude VanWinkle (Jan 04)
- Re: Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!! Line Noise (Jan 02)
- Message not available
- Re: Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!! list spam (Jan 02)
- Re: Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!! reepex (Jan 02)
- Re: Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!! Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 02)
- Re: Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!! sys (Jan 04)
- Re: Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!! Ishan Oshadi Jayawardene (Jan 05)