Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch
From: "Michael Krymson" <krymson () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:44:38 -0600
1) Are you running low on meds this late in the month? If so, do we need to start a collection so you can afford them in time before you subject us with further ranting, raving, and lunacy? Actually, I wouldn't mind ranting, raving, and lunacy if it came from someone who wasn't also stupid and completely oblivious to their own plight... 2) Further comments are inline although I expect you won't bother to adequetely address them, ever. On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:50 AM, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:
"The software giant rushed out a fix for the security issue in eight days, following its discovery that online criminals were using the flaw to attack Internet users." http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/873 This is because they usually hold back disclosure and patch release so the intelligence services can backdoor criminal and terrorist pc's.
Do you have anything to back this claim?
We're not saying Microsoft has never been capable to release a patch in eight days, we're saying there is an agreement with the government not to, unless a flaw is publicly known and is affecting the internet-at-large.
Do you have anything to back this claim?
There are a ton of zero-day that Microsoft and the government know about and are used for intelligence purposes, they are kept secret unless the public know about it and the zero-day becomes a threat to the government.
Do you have anything to back this claim?
Though the fact is this, MI5 have zero-day that not even Microsoft know about and not only this, MI5 have their systems patched against flaws that are not known about by other entities.
What i'm saying is this: MI5's systems are patched against flaws that only they know about and their technicians have developed their own in-house patches for them.
Fact? Now you're really needing to cite some sources or backing, otherwise this is, in fact, not fact. You are not technically inclined. You have said it yourself and have demonstrated such for years on this list. So I'm not surprised you don't understand patching and vulnerability research. Maybe they have their own mitigations and workarounds, but that is a certainly different ballgame.
If that isn't impressive I don't know what is.
The only thing impressive is how oblivious, delusional, and incompetent you are.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch Some Guy Posting To Full Disclosure (Dec 19)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch n3td3v (Dec 19)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch Ureleet (Dec 21)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 22)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch Ureleet (Dec 19)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch Nick FitzGerald (Dec 21)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch n3td3v (Dec 21)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch kevin . fielder (Dec 21)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch Ureleet (Dec 21)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch Ureleet (Dec 21)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch n3td3v (Dec 21)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch n3td3v (Dec 22)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch j-f sentier (Dec 22)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch Ureleet (Dec 22)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch n3td3v (Dec 22)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch j-f sentier (Dec 22)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch n3td3v (Dec 22)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch Ureleet (Dec 22)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch Bipin Gautam (Dec 22)
- Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch Ureleet (Dec 22)