Re: Fwd: Let's outlaw mass security conference spamming its fucking gay

[Ureleet <ureleet () gmail com>]

lets look at it from a marketing point of view.  not everyone is going
to be on the conference mailing list.  more people are going to be on
security mailing lists.  i understand your point of view, but it just
wont work.  Use common sense.

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:56 PM, n3td3v <n3td3v () gmail com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Ureleet <ureleet () gmail com> wrote:
>  > "Full-Disclosure, I want action taken on the *growing* amount of
>  >  security conference spam."
>  >
>  >  u do know that just because you demand or want action taken that it
>  >  doesn't mean that such will take place right?
>  >
>  >  stop trolling.
>
>  I'm not trolling if I want a security conference mailing list setup so
>  the rest of us don't need to suffer an inbox of 20 identical
>  commerical *come to our conference, or, book our training*.
>
>  This is a big issue, and if we dont create a mailing list for it, next
>  year we won't have 20 duplicates per spam run, we'll have 40 per spam
>  run.
>
>  Imagine if n3td3v post to *every* mailing list and not just *one*,
>  would you not get tired and frustrated?
>
>  All the best,
>
>  n3td3v

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/