Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: lots of connections to 64.40.117.19 port 80


From: offbitz <offbitz () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:21:09 -0500

I didn't see any claims being made, just a question, albeit maybe
rhetorical.

Either way, who gives a shit.  Back to the OP-

*Recently I have seen a lots of connections to 64.40.117.19 port 80 in
one of our clients network.
Connections are coming from all over the Internet (various different
IPs) specifically to this IP.*

      I'm not sure if I'm misunderstanding this, or if the grammar is just
unpleasant. It's always nice to make sure before I show my ass.

     I would assume the first sentence means you are seeing outgoing
connections, from your client's site, destined for the IP/port above.  So
then, the second sentence makes even less sense, connections coming into
your network from all over the Internet, but 'specifically to this IP'?
Huh?  Maybe I just need more coffee, but please explain this one for me.

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Joey Mengele <joey.mengele () hushmail com>
wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Unless you have some evidence such as the evidence Dr. Neal Krawetz
was able to provide re: GOBBLES and n3td3v, this claim is
irresponsible and I urge the other members of the list to ignore it.

J

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:38:44 -0400 news () dmcdonald net wrote:
lol. Are you related to n3td3v?



On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:30:19 -0400 news () dmcdonald net wrote:

Sorry to answer for Valdis, but here...

https://dmcdonald.net/iframe.html if I were a *VERY* popular
site,
that
would ddos google. Although including somekind of search request
would
make it a little better, and realisticly id go down well before
google.

I find it interesting you were able to develop a tool to DDoS
Google so quickly. Is there something going on with you I need
to
know about? Last time I checked, this was full-disclosure not
black-
hat.


But it's not exactly rocket science, is it? Although you may
have
been
confused by the term "iframe injection".


Is it *rocket* science? Or is it *computer* science? What I
propose
is that it is neither. In fact, what I propose is that it is
*black-
hat* science. I still respectfully disagree with your analysis
though. Perhaps more evidence on how you have successfully
DDoS'd
Google in the past?

Best,

Darren

Same,

J

--
Take a break - you deserve it.  Click here to find a great
vacation.

http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4eO7OQLKog65wrqqMcnKoSisQi0fGB
6FdexfXT6BJaweROFG/



--
Click to create your dream New Zealand vacation now.

http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4dwon8xb8VEzU6pUnTbckDVIyckWUxRcFxAxZVhI78VbrEfO/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread: