Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: New term "RDV" is born
From: "worried security" <worriedsecurity () googlemail com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:31:53 +0100
On 9/28/07, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:29:51 BST, worried security said:Two months is still recently. Think about "In recent history we invaded Iraq", "In recent times terrorism has become more prominent".The real problem here is that "0-day" originally meant "previously undisclosed vulnerability/exploit". The term lost its usefulness when all the hacker wannabe's started posting "I found a 0-day", when what they really had was a "*yawn*-we've-been-waiting-18-months-for-vendor-to-fix-day".
Yes, Valdis, and thats why a new modern term for 0-day is needed. Forget 0-day, its the past, RDV is the future.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: .NET REMOTING on port 31337, (continued)
- Re: .NET REMOTING on port 31337 Fabrizio (Sep 28)
- Re: .NET REMOTING on port 31337 Simon Smith (Sep 28)
- Re: .NET REMOTING on port 31337 Fabrizio (Sep 28)
- Re: .NET REMOTING on port 31337 Simon Smith (Sep 28)
- Re: .NET REMOTING on port 31337 Joel R. Helgeson (Sep 28)
- Re: .NET REMOTING on port 31337 Fabrizio (Sep 28)
- Message not available
- Re: .NET REMOTING on port 31337 Joel R. Helgeson (Sep 30)
- Re: New term "RDV" is born Jimby Sharp (Sep 28)
- Re: New term "RDV" is born J. Oquendo (Sep 28)
- Re: New term "RDV" is born nocfed (Sep 28)
- Re: New term "RDV" is born worried security (Sep 28)
- Re: New term "RDV" is born Kevin Finisterre (lists) (Sep 28)
- Re: New term "RDV" is born Guasconi Vincent (Sep 30)
- Re: New term "RDV" is born Jimby Sharp (Sep 30)
- Re: New term "RDV" is born Kevin Finisterre (lists) (Sep 28)