Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Gadi Evron strikes again


From: gjgowey () tmo blackberry net
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:43:05 +0000

I think the real problem is that worried security suffers from undescended testicles.

Geoff

Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Richard Golodner" <rgolodner () infratection com>

Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:33:10 
To:"'worried security'" <worriedsecurity () googlemail com>,<full-disclosure () lists grok org uk>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Gadi Evron strikes again


WoriedSecurity said”blah, blah, nothing”. 
Do you know Gadi? Have you ever corresponded with him? He adds some valuable knowledge to a legitimate issue that most 
Service Providers down to the home user should be aware of. 
I read the “serious 0-day” thread and I think you are just pissed off. If you had some balls you would use your real 
name like most legitimate networkers do instead of hiding behind a pseudonym. 
Check Gadi’s work and see for yourself instead of letting your hurt feelings get in the way. Talk about script kiddies. 
Jesus man, are you sure you real name is not n3td3v? I do not see anyone soliciting your opinion about anything. What 
have you contributed to the body of knowledge? All I read is juvenile BS. Mail from WorriedSecurity now gets dumped 
before it even sees my mail client. 
            Thanks for making it clear that you’re an ass. 
Richard Golodner 
  
 
 
----------------
 
From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of 
worried security
 Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 9:11 AM
 To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
 Subject: [Full-disclosure] Gadi Evron strikes again 
  
 
Who seen Gadi Evron on the mailing lists trolling about what a 0day is and what a 0day isn't, in the middle of a 
serious disclosure about a PDF flaw? 
 
  
 
Hilarious. 
 
  
 
Well, just incase you missed it, here it is again... 
 
  
 
http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2007/Sep/0229.html <http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2007/Sep/0229.html> 
 
  
 
And this guy wants to be a high profile guy at the forefront of information security discussion? 
 
  
 
lolzers. 
 
  
 
Script kiddos unite behind the big man Evron. 
 
  
 
He leads, where the rest of us follow. 
 
  
 
And he comes on the lists complaining people are mimicing his e-mail addresses and calling him a dick. *I wonder why?* 
 
  
 
 
Its funny, he strongly keeps an eye on Funsec mailing list and keeps everyone in check,Yet, he has a total disregard 
for "quality control" else where, especially on Bugtraq!!!!!!!! 
 
  
 
My question is "Who is Gadi Evron?". 
 
  
 
This guy you would think would add something special to a discussion, but he doesn't, and you know what I know his 
excuse is? He is keeping his knowledge secret so bad guys can't learn from his knowledge. 
 
  
 
lolzers Gadi Evron. 
 
  
 
The truth is, Gadi just wants to make sure his name and e-mail address is in every major flaw disclosure, no matter how 
lame the comment is, just as long as his name and e-mail is in high profile disclosures, then Gadi Evron can sleep at 
night. 
 
  
 
Thanks Gadi!!! My hero. 
 
  
 
Bugtraq is moderated for a reason, so Bugtraq moderators, start moderating it!!! Symantec arsewipes. 
 
  
 
Securityfocus, no really, why are you allowing Gadi Evron troll on such a high profile respected moderated list? Gadi's 
comment mentioned above was a true breach of the rules, so start moderating his comments more in future. 
 
  
 
Leave the trolling for F-D Gadi, Bugtraq readers don't want to see your shit in future, and Bugtraq moderators, 
actually read what Gadi Evron is posting in future, instead of just reading the name and sender and approving the 
message without actually reading the body. 
 
  
 
*Oh its Gadi, its automatically approved* 
 
  
 
Lets look at Bugtraq's description: 
 
  
 
"BugTraq is a full disclosure moderated mailing list for the *detailed* discussion and announcement of computer 
security vulnerabilities: what they are, how to exploit them, and how to fix them. " 
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/description#0.1.1 
 
  
 
lolzers, Bugtraq moderators don't read thier own shit or inforce it! 
 
  
 
Someone snip a bit of that description that gives Gadi right of way to troll on Bugtraq in the middle of serious flaw 
disclosures!!!!! 
 
  
 
Gadi, seriously f**king learn about the stuff you read , so you can actually input into the threads and help with the 
topic infront of you, instead of random off-topic messages about what defines a 0-day and what doesn't. 
 
  
 
Why didn't you start your own thread on Bugtraq about "what is a 0-day?", because they wouldn't let you!!!! Instead you 
sneak your shit into high profile threads, to get a name for yourself. 
 
  
 
Your conversation, as always Gadi, is best suited for Full-Disclosure or security-basics, so get the f*** off Bugtraq 
you idiot. _______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: