Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: [fuzzing] Vulnerable test application: Simple Web Server (SWS)


From: Ari Takanen <ari.takanen () codenomicon com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:37:28 +0300

Thanks Gadi,

Good stuff. Only problem we are having with it that it keeps crashing
even with all the vulnerabilities disabled in the GUI. This makes
verifying the findings a bit harder. :)

E.g. disable all vulnerabilities in the GUI and try sending this
through netcat to SWS and voila!

GET / HTTP/1.1
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, */*
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-Language: en-us
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Length: -1
Host: www.example.com:80
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Codenomicon HTTP Server Test Tool; Windows NT 5.1; 11549; 
http11-content-length-v-int)

Best regards,

Ari Takanen & Jari Tauriainen (who did the dirty testing work)

PS. "This web server MUST NEVER BE USED ON THE INTERNET" - couldn't agree
more, even with all the intended vulnerabilities disabled. ;)

PPS. Seriously, Good Work! We need more neutral non-critical test
targets like this. ;)

On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 12:00:02PM -0500, fuzzing-request () whitestar linuxbox org wrote:
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:06:29 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>

Every once in a while (last time a few months ago) someone emails one of 
the mailing lists about searching for an example binary, mostly for:

- Reverse engineering for vulnerabilities, as a study tool.
- Testing fuzzers

Some of these exist, but I asked my employer, Beyond Security, to release 
our test application, specific for testing fuzzing (built for the beSTORM 
fuzzer). They agreed to release the HTTP version, following their 
agreement to release our ANI XML specification.

The GUI allows you to choose what port your want to run it on, as well as 
which vulnerabilities should be "active".

It is called Simple Web Server or SWS, and has the following 
vulnerabilities:

    1. Off-By-One in Content-Length (Integer overflow/malloc issue)
    2. Overflow in User-Agent
    3. Overflow in Method
    4. Overflow in URI
    5. Overflow in Host
    6. Overflow in Version
    7. Overflow in complete packet
    8. Off By One in Receive function (linefeed/carriage return issue)
    9. Overflow in Authorization Type
   10. Overflow in Base64 decoded
   11. Overflow in Username of authorization
   12. Overflow in Password of authorization
   13. Overflow in Body
   14. Cross site scripting

It can be found on Beyond Security's website, here:
http://www.beyondsecurity.com/sws_overview.html

Thanks,

Gadi Evron.

-- 
-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-
Ari Takanen                       Codenomicon Ltd.
ari.takanen () codenomicon com       Tutkijantie 4E
tel: +358-40 50 67678             FIN-90570 Oulu
http://www.codenomicon.com        Finland
PGP: http://www.codenomicon.com/codenomicon-key.asc
-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: