Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Python 2.5 (Modules/zlib) minigzip local buffer overflow vulnerability
From: "Brian Eaton" <eaton.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:05:58 -0400
On 3/15/07, Ismail Dönmez <ismail () pardus org tr> wrote:
On Thursday 15 March 2007 04:26:29 James Matthews wrote:and you would think some bugs we got rid of in open source software!str{cpy,cat,...} which don't take an size attribute should be removed from standard libc, I don't see why people still insist on using this insecure variants.
You could ask the same question on why people insist on writing new code in C and C++. It's what they know how to do. For most projects it's not necessary, and it's not good, but it is familiar. Regards, Brian _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Python 2.5 (Modules/zlib) minigzip local buffer overflow vulnerability starcadi starcadi (Mar 14)
- Re: Python 2.5 (Modules/zlib) minigzip local buffer overflow vulnerability James Matthews (Mar 14)
- Re: Python 2.5 (Modules/zlib) minigzip local buffer overflow vulnerability Ismail Dönmez (Mar 15)
- Re: Python 2.5 (Modules/zlib) minigzip local buffer overflow vulnerability Marcus Meissner (Mar 15)
- Re: Python 2.5 (Modules/zlib) minigzip local buffer overflow vulnerability Ismail Dönmez (Mar 15)
- Re: Python 2.5 (Modules/zlib) minigzip local buffer overflow vulnerability Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Re: Python 2.5 (Modules/zlib) minigzip local buffer overflow vulnerability Ismail Dönmez (Mar 15)
- Re: Python 2.5 (Modules/zlib) minigzip local buffer overflow vulnerability Ismail Dönmez (Mar 15)
- Re: Python 2.5 (Modules/zlib) minigzip local buffer overflow vulnerability Brian Eaton (Mar 16)
- Re: Python 2.5 (Modules/zlib) minigzip local buffer overflow vulnerability James Matthews (Mar 14)