Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Signal to Noise Ratio


From: "Joey Mengele" <joey.mengele () hushmail com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:24:49 -0400

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

Grow up.

J

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:23:08 -0400 "Fetch, Brandon" 
<bfetch () tpg com> wrote:
*reaches for the raincoat for the pending continued pissing match*

Anyone have waterproof popcorn?

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of 
Joey
Mengele
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 2:15 PM
To: jason () killerinterviews com; 3apa3a () security nnov ru
Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Signal to Noise Ratio

This is an English speaking list. Please translate.

Grow up.

J

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:07:15 -0400 3APA3A 
<3APA3A () SECURITY NNOV RU> 
wrote:
Dear jason () killerinterviews com,

--Tuesday, July 24, 2007, 5:02:16 PM, you wrote to full-
disclosure () lists grok org uk:

jkc>   It seems to me the average SNR here could be greatly 
improved with any
jkc> one of several commonly available "community-based" 
filtering
jkc> mechanisms.  Digg and Slashdot are both examples of what I'm 

suggesting.

This  subject  arises  here  twice  an  year.  List needs 
_professional_
moderation, like Bugtraq has. because:

1.  Next  thing  to  research  will  be  attacks against 
community-
based
filtering mechanisms.

2.  No, thanks, see enough "community moderators" things with 
Wikipedia,
where  sense  of  good always hits common sense. It's well known 
who has
high  desire  to moderate: not a professional with deep topic 
knowledge.
Michael   Zalewski  was  filtered  from  "hackers"  for  few  
years  for
self-promotion  (Was  it  Stallman  who  edited  this article or 
15-year
schoolboy  who  read nothing but few articles about... let me 
remember..
Melissa  worm?). Bad for you, Michael, you promote yourself 
again! 
I was
not  able  to  add article about free open source software, as I 
am only
listed software developer (I really am): it's promotion. Just 
wonder: if
somebody  looks for specific software in Wikipedia, is it better 
to have
potentially  promotional  article  from  it's  developer  or do 
not have
article at all?


-- 
~/ZARAZA http://securityvulns.com/


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

--
HASH(0x8be1f18)
HASH(0x8be1b7c)
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4d80lgEQMbVvsFVcKkzEfbdfzp47Z5
fwJxD
QcDnCBZDZBYvu/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


This message is intended only for the person(s) to which it is 
addressed 
and may contain privileged, confidential and/or insider 
information. 
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us 

immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your 
computer. 
Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action 
concerning
the contents of this message and any attachment(s) by anyone other 

than the named recipient(s) is strictly prohibited.

--
HASH(0x8c843bc)
HASH(0x8bd27f0)
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4dCaN5NmTOs358JygQCya5fRdWgpfXtOQLTfP6CxiHHaHt9W/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: