Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Rixstep aren't as leet as they thought they were
From: security curmudgeon <jericho () attrition org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:40:30 -0500 (EST)
: "It may not come as a shocker, but so far the Month of Rixstep Bugs : has not netted a single bug." : -- http://rixstep.com/1/20070115,00.shtml : : Maybe because nobody was looking? http://osvdb.org/blog/?p=160 Month of .. who?! Posted in General Vulnerability Info on January 15th, 2007 by jericho http://rixstep.com/2/20070104,00.shtml : A Month of Rixstep Bugs : Its a win-win proposition. : Starting now and for the duration of January 2007 Rixstep will be : holding a Month of Rixstep Bugs campaign: find a bug in any Rixstep : software product and win a prize. Its not a win-win proposition, it is a lame gimmick. After the month of apple bugs, week of (cancelled) oracle bugs, and the month of linux kernel bugs, Rixstep wants in on the bandwagon. Few small problems: 1. They posted this announcement on the 4th, not even giving a full month. 2. They didnt post this to Bugtraq, Full-Disclosure or any other security list/resource I monitor. 3. Rixstep doesnt have the saturation that Linux, Apple or Oracle do. It is considerably easier to test those products and platforms versus Rixstep, who many of us have never heard of, let alone seen deployed. If you want to play with the big boys Rixstep, man up and put some of your products up on your site and post the challenge to Bugtraq and Full-Disclosure. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Rixstep aren't as leet as they thought they were Rixstep Pwned (Jan 15)
- Re: Rixstep aren't as leet as they thought they were security curmudgeon (Jan 15)