Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability
From: Base64 <base640 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:31:01 -0800
This vuln is not exploitable in this condition against IIS server 6 and possibly earlier versions. IIS will die on the null character in the new request. It doesn't seem like anyone has brought up this fact. Example (IIS): location.hostname='microsoft.com\x00www.coredump.cx'; Output: microsoft.com returns '400 Bad Request.'. Any input would be appreciated until the obvious patch comes out. Regards, base On 2/15/07, pdp (architect) <pdp.gnucitizen () googlemail com> wrote:
weird, firefox slowly dies out t2.html <html> <body> <iframe src="t1.html"></iframe> </body> </html> t1.html <html> <body> <script>location.hostname="blog.com";</script> </body> </html> On 2/15/07, pdp (architect) <pdp.gnucitizen () googlemail com> wrote:the first one runs in about:blank which is restricted. the second one is very interesting but still not very useful because it acts like about:blank. hmmm it seams that the hostname field has been seriously overlooked. On 2/15/07, Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf () dione ids pl> wrote:On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, pdp (architect) wrote:I wander whether we can execute code on about:config or about:cache.Actually, there are several odd problems related to location updates and location.hostname specifically, including one scenario that apparently makes the script run with document.location in about: namespace. I did not research them any further, so I can't say if they're exploitable - but you can see a demo here, feel free to poke around: http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/fftests.html Cheers, /mz http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/-- pdp (architect) | petko d. petkov http://www.gnucitizen.org-- pdp (architect) | petko d. petkov http://www.gnucitizen.org
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability, (continued)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Peter Besenbruch (Feb 14)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Daniel Veditz (Feb 14)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability James Matthews (Feb 14)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Peter Besenbruch (Feb 14)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability 3APA3A (Feb 15)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Michal Zalewski (Feb 15)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability pdp (architect) (Feb 16)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Michal Zalewski (Feb 15)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Stan Bubrouski (Feb 15)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability pdp (architect) (Feb 15)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability pdp (architect) (Feb 15)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Base64 (Feb 16)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Michal Zalewski (Feb 21)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Michal Zalewski (Feb 15)
- Re: Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Michal Zalewski (Feb 17)