Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - )
From: "Paul Melson" <pmelson () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 07:00:40 -0500
On Dec 20, 2007 7:19 PM, SecReview <secreview () hushmail com> wrote:
1.) What are your qualifications for reviewing these companies?We are a team of security professionals that have been performing a wide array of penetration tests, vulnerability assessments, web application security services etc. One of our team members has founded two different security companies both of which have been very successful and have offered high quality services. Yes we have all sorts of pretty little certifications, but those don't really matter.
So this is basically a tacit admission that every one of your "team" has something to gain by smearing the competition. At this point, I'm inclined to believe that the firms you've scored favorably are your employers. You're not only incompetent, it seems that you're unethical as well. Not that I'm surprised. PaulM _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - ) SecReview (Dec 20)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - ) coderman (Dec 20)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - ) Sec Review Sucks (Dec 20)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - ) Sec Review Sucks (Dec 20)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - ) Paul Melson (Dec 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( F - ) coderman (Dec 20)