Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + )

From: "Peter Dawson" <slash.pd () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:11:43 -0500

Agreed.  !!

I think theres a lot of 'fair play' with the secreview folks.  -- "We're
going to give Cybertrust a "C" but if you can convince us that they deserve
a different grade then we'll revise our opinion."

So they are open for rebuttals and to changing their opinions !

On Dec 20, 2007 9:55 AM, Epic <epic () hack3r com> wrote:

Isn't ANY review subjective to opinion?    I do not understand the basis
of this flame.  It appears to me that a lot of the reviews on this site
offer some great insight into the companies being presented.   Granted it is
an opinion, but that is what a blog is isn't it?

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread:

[Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + ) secreview (Dec 19)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + ) guiness . stout (Dec 20)
  - Re: [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + ) c0redump (Dec 20)
    - Re: [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + ) Epic (Dec 20)
    - Re: [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + ) Peter Dawson (Dec 20)
    - Re: [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + ) Kurt Dillard (Dec 20)
    - Re: [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + ) Mike Vasquez (Dec 20)
    - Message not available
    - Re: [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + ) guiness . stout (Dec 20)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + ) trains (Dec 20)