Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Thomas Ptacek and Wikipedia
From: coderman <coderman () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:51:29 -0800
On Dec 14, 2007 8:22 AM, Gobbles is back <isbackgobbles () googlemail com> wrote:
... Quick cheeky posting by unknown gobble member staff over Thomas Ptacek's latest Wikipedia absurdness.
PS: Your Homework Assignments Thomas Ptacek to retract all stupid commentary from world wide web. examples: "I don't think this is a timing attack; it's a side-channel attack that exploits the fact that OpenSSL's impact on the branch prediction cache leaks information." correction: timing attacks are a subset of side channel attacks, therefore the above comment is stupid. examples: "we were turning out more lines of code per day than my old employer! Turns out I forgot about a little thing called QA" correction: detailing how poorly "build security in" and solid engineering are applied to your forthcoming security product is bad. it makes executives and marketing angry! many more to list. i expect 3,463,492 words rewritten double spaced on formal retraction by end of week. ,,,,,,,,,,,, GOBBLES your homework is less gossip more sploits. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Thomas Ptacek and Wikipedia Gobbles is back (Dec 15)
- Re: Thomas Ptacek and Wikipedia coderman (Dec 15)
- Re: Thomas Ptacek and Wikipedia coderman (Dec 15)
- Re: Thomas Ptacek and Wikipedia coderman (Dec 15)