Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
From: c0ntex <c0ntexb () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:40:36 +0100
If you consider that America are able to lie about the weapons of mass destruction and then admit it, use chemical weapons in Iraq and lie about it and then admit it, trick Saudi Arabia that Sadam Hussein was attacking their border to allow army convoys to be deployed in their country, mishandle Iraqs millions of dollars which seemed to vanish (which is currently under investigation with 3 confirmed arrests), a power company who coincidentally has a top US official on the board of directors win a multi million dollar contract with no competition to do ALL the power restoration work in Iraq. So America own the world with their porkies yet the most powerful country in the world is incapable of influencing 8 or 10 people about a war record which is controlled by the US government, influencing 1 man in charge of the IVAW (which they never actually deny this man was a member), and drop 2 news articles to Americans media to bad name this man then you have been eating too many pancakes and twinkies. On Wikipedia they also discuss the mans "criminal history", what has that got to do with anything other than making the man seem unreliable. If you look at the media on my blog, you will notice many distressing issues, you will actually see innocent people being shot and the soldiers laughing on several occasions - it is not just this one video by this one man. The most well known behind the scenes investigation program "Dispatches", from the UK does numerous documentaries on these issues, as well as the most highly credible news reporters - are they also telling porkies? I hardly think so. There are numerous other people who talk about the terror that has gone on in Iraq, including the use white phosphorous of which is then verified by 2 ex soldiers (US) along with live media footage of the drops, doctor examinations and leaked documents from the US and UK..... but like I said, you are all entitled to your own opinions. On 11/09/06, pauls () utdallas edu <pauls () utdallas edu> wrote:
--On September 11, 2006 8:20:51 PM +0100 c0ntex <c0ntexb () gmail com> wrote: > You are entitled to your opinion. > Yeah, and it sucks this his is fact-based, doesn't it? Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-- regards c0ntex _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 09)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Philosophil (Sep 11)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Troy Cregger (Sep 11)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 11)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this pauls (Sep 11)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 11)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Anders B Jansson (Sep 11)
- Message not available
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Troy Cregger (Sep 11)