Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
From: "Tyop?" <tyoptyop () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:17:06 +0100
On 11/26/06, Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk> wrote:
daylasoul () hush com wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Please maintain a reasonable standard of netiquette when posting. Thanks.Who died and made you list-nanny? Oh, that's right no-fucking-one. Your pathetic posts contribute nothing but noise to the list -- piss off...
Thinking that respect of standard is pathetic (netiquette here), will result in all communications, over internet or not, --> "noise". -- Tyop? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability dead code crew (Nov 22)
- Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability Sean Comeau (Nov 22)
- Message not available
- *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability Tyop? (Nov 22)
- Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability endrazine (Nov 22)
- Message not available
- Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability J.A. Terranson (Nov 25)
- Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability Sean Comeau (Nov 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability daylasoul (Nov 26)
- Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability Nick FitzGerald (Nov 26)
- Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability Tyop? (Nov 26)
- Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability Nick FitzGerald (Nov 26)
- Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability Nick FitzGerald (Nov 26)