Re: RE: Panda Antivirus Enterprise Secure, NortonAntivirus 2005 and the virus

[Steven Rakick <stevenrakick () yahoo com>]

Guys, these are signature-based systems... 

LET ME SHED SOME LIGHT ON THIS, ALL SIGNATURE-BASED
SYSTEMS CAN BE SUBVERTED. THIS IS A KNOWN FACT PEOPLE
HAVE BEEN DISCUSSING FOR YEARS. 

Let me be the first to welcome you to the year 1999.


From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On
Behalf Of Thiago H. Pojda
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 11:00 AM
To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: Panda Antivirus
Enterprise Secure,NortonAntivirus 2005 and the virus

The major point of the thread is that some of the most
popular AV scanners used in big companies, do not
detect it. 

Yea, I did post that AVG scanner detected it. And also
a few other people did the same with their AV
scanners. And that is scary because even small or
non-so-well-known av scanners detect a slight
difference in a virus file and the oh-so-almighty ones
don't.
On 5/4/06, Steven Rakick <stevenrakick () yahoo com>
wrote: 
Great. Now we're going to have every freaking dork
with an AV posting about how their system detected it.


GOOD WORK, FUCKO.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com 



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/