Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: blue security folds
From: nocfed <nocfed () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 23:35:47 -0500
On 5/17/06, Peter Besenbruch <prb () lava net> wrote:
Mike Adams wrote: > I'm really disappointed. > > All this will do is give all the other scumbag spammers out there proof > that using these tactics will work, and they will be able to extort > anyone. > > Who will be next, Trend Micro? Fortinet? Symantec? SANS? If they actually do something effective against spam, then yes. Blue Security was effective in hitting spammers in the pocketbook. Therefore, they were targeted. More than that, the spammers began targeting broader swaths of the Internet, taking out Typepad, Livejournal, and Tucows. The attacker, a person whose handle is "Pharma Master," basically stated, if he couldn't spam, there would be no Internet. Given that botnets are so cheap, that was not an idle threat. Bill Gates, I would personally like to thank you for creating a monopoly operating system that is so easy to compromise. I'm sure Pharma Master thanks you as well, though he may never publicly express it. He really should consider a generous donation to the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation as a token of appreciation. Any Mafia boss worth his salt would do the same. -- Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky
And if the ISP's could get their act together then most of the botnets would be no more. This _IS_ something that can be controlled, to an extent. Many of the network administrators need a course in Networking 101 which will greatly assist in tracking down the source of attacks. If botnets are required to use their own IP's then how hard would it really be to track them down and disable them? Disruption of the end users connection and a flag on their account should clean them up, although not 100%. So if you want someone to blame, blame the ISP, blame the hosting service, and blame the end user. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- blue security folds Gadi Evron (May 17)
- bluesecurity IS the spammers you fools. Re: blue security folds donnydark (May 18)
- Re: bluesecurity IS the spammers you fools. Re: [Full-disclosure] blue security folds Valdis . Kletnieks (May 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: blue security folds Mike Adams (May 17)
- Re: blue security folds Peter Besenbruch (May 17)
- Re: blue security folds nocfed (May 17)
- Re: blue security folds Gaddis, Jeremy L. (May 17)
- Re: blue security folds Michael Silk (May 17)
- Re: blue security folds evilrabbi (May 18)
- Re: blue security folds Steve Kudlak (May 18)
- Re: blue security folds Kyle Lutze (May 18)
- Re: blue security folds Peter Besenbruch (May 17)
- bluesecurity IS the spammers you fools. Re: blue security folds donnydark (May 18)
- Re: blue security folds nocfed (May 19)
- Re: blue security folds Aaron Gray (May 19)