Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: How secure is software X?
From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:09:03 -0700
Brian Eaton wrote:
On 5/11/06, Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com> wrote:Don't we fairly quickly arrive at all products passing all the standard tests, and "passing" no longer means anything?I believe that point is called "success."
I was thinking more like all their "security" efforts only went to making sure the test reports clean, and they get declared "secure". Now you have two products that pass the tests regardless of relative security, or whether one of them was carefully developed with security in mind. Not my definition of success.
BB _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- How secure is software X? David Litchfield (May 11)
- Re: How secure is software X? Michael Silk (May 11)
- Re: How secure is software X? David Litchfield (May 11)
- Re: How secure is software X? Blue Boar (May 11)
- Re: How secure is software X? Brian Eaton (May 12)
- Re: How secure is software X? Blue Boar (May 12)
- Re: How secure is software X? Brian Eaton (May 12)
- Re: How secure is software X? sebastian . rother (May 12)
- Re: How secure is software X? Brian Eaton (May 12)
- Re: How secure is software X? Michael Silk (May 11)
- Re: How secure is software X? Lucien Fransman (May 12)
- Re: How secure is software X? Lucien Fransman (May 12)
- Re: How secure is software X? Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez (May 13)
- Re: How secure is software X? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: How secure is software X? Ferguson, Justin (IARC) (May 12)