Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: DOS device name handling
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 16:29:14 -0400
On Mon, 01 May 2006 21:58:22 +0200, Klaudiusz Kulik said:
Thanks ZARAZA for enlightenment. But... don't You think that it's stupid? If name is not allowed, why it is when '/' is appended? In fact these names are the same, effects of using these names are the same [with or without '/']. And if name is not allowed, why I may create that prohibited directory? Really, I don't understand. According to MSDN - - it's feature, but I have doubt. Anyway - thanks again for reply.
http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/B/BAD.html
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- DOS device name handling Klaudiusz Kulik (May 01)
- Re: DOS device name handling 3APA3A (May 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DOS device name handling Klaudiusz Kulik (May 01)
- Re: Re: DOS device name handling Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)