Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY
From: n3td3v <n3td3v () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:12:16 +0100
Is that the same as hacking someones "domain", accepting the Gmail confirmation to say you're allowed to send from a Gmail account with that hacked domain, then delete all forensic logs from the hacked domain and then go back to your Gmail account, where you can continue to send your inflamed FD comments from as very () hackeddomain com. Figures. On 3/31/06, php0t <very () unprivate com> wrote:
If you kept your word (and didn't post my emails back to the list), it'd be better. :) -----Original Message----- *From:* n3td3v [mailto:n3td3v () gmail com] *Sent:* Friday, March 31, 2006 10:47 PM *To:* php0t; full-disclosure () lists grok org uk *Subject:* Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY Why don't you just "filter" me like "the experts" have told you to do? Or haven't you worked out the technical background architecture of Outlook and Thunderbird yet? Figures. On 3/31/06, php0t <very () unprivate com> wrote:For real, please keep your word. -----Original Message----- *From:* full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk ] *On Behalf Of *n3td3v *Sent:* Friday, March 31, 2006 9:55 PM *To:* full-disclosure () lists grok org uk *Subject:* [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY This is funny as well, http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15591&messageID=131539&start=-1&reply=true I almost choked on my big mac after reading this one, the guy thinks if you take down a site, the phisher's script doesn't deploy another premade site straight away on another host. lol, maybe the RSA have miscalculated the pre plainning and programming of a phishing attack backend before its carried out. I guess they just thought phishing was down to "dumb criminals". On 3/31/06, n3td3v <n3td3v () gmail com> wrote:Check out this article, and I really did spill my hard earned Starbucks right down my front when I looked at this article: http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15591&messageID=131433&start=-1_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY n3td3v (Mar 31)
- Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 31)
- Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY n3td3v (Mar 31)
- Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY n3td3v (Mar 31)
- Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY Nancy Kramer (Mar 31)
- Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY n3td3v (Mar 31)
- Message not available
- Re: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY n3td3v (Mar 31)
- RE: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY php0t (Mar 31)
- Re: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY n3td3v (Mar 31)
- RE: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY php0t (Mar 31)
- Re: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY n3td3v (Mar 31)
- Message not available
- Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY ducki3 (Mar 31)
- Re: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY Steven (Mar 31)
- Re: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY n3td3v (Mar 31)
- Re: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY n3td3v (Mar 31)
- Message not available
- Re: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY n3td3v (Mar 31)
- Re: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY Steven (Mar 31)