Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear on internet
From: <bart.lansing () hushmail com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:04:22 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Opinion on actual topic forthcoming: As someone not hiding behind a pseudo-leet handle, who actually does get to deal with ramifications of Microsoft's (and others, of course) patch policies, I heartily endorse the release of the eEye patch as beneficial and as a patch that will be in the hands of large numbers of users outside the infosec community in short order. In fact, it already is. The Washington Post, ComputerWorld, ZDNet, Business Wire, The Register, and a host of others are all publicing its existence...kudos to them. n3td3v, whoever you are, you have been little more than a source of occasionally amusing noise on this list. However, when you attempt to put yourself into a position where some poor unsuspecting IT sot might actually listen to what you have to say and impact real people doing real business...well, maybe you need to rethink your need for self-gratification and this hopeless quest for recognition from anyone who in fact 'does' have a clue or a legitimate place on this list. Try, if you can, to weigh the needs of your obviously undernourished ego with the real needs of people who might accidently follow some of your advice. On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:45:18 -0600 n3td3v <n3td3v () gmail com> wrote:
No security alert? Unofficial patches is very much a security alert. You say i'm not adding anything to the list, but what are *you* adding, apart from off-topic bitch remarks about thread authors. When you have the confidence to post your opinion on the actual topic, then i'll be glad to hear from you. On 3/28/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <michealespinola () gmail com> wrote:Patch Tuesday = Good before third party patches appear Third party patch = Evil Patch Tuesday = Bad for everyone after third party patchesappear,even Microsoft... Ahh, but you forgot one: n3td3v = Annoying. Posting as an individual or as a "group"... Your "security alert" has offered nothing in terms of FullDisclosureor any actual security alert. You'd be better served to sendyour"opinion" to the Patch Management list. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 2.5 wkYEARECAAYFAkQppNYACgkQuCj5fjTzkbAjXgCfVUkFQ6Gc5W5TG3Mz5gfU47cbB9IA oL30dCyCafI4Cx8S6NFJDXqUnoy9 =7hC9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear on internet, (continued)
- Re: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear on internet nocfed (Mar 28)
- Re: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear on internet Micheal Espinola Jr (Mar 28)
- Re: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear on internet Matthew Murphy (Mar 28)
- RE: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appearon internet William Lefkovics (Mar 28)
- Re: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear oninternet GroundZero Security (Mar 29)
- Re: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear oninternet n3td3v (Mar 29)
- Re: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appearoninternet (off topic) GroundZero Security (Mar 29)
- Re: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear oninternet crazy frog crazy frog (Mar 29)
- Re: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear oninternet n3td3v (Mar 29)
- Re: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear on internet n3td3v (Mar 28)
- Re: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear on internet Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 28)
- RE: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear oninternet William Lefkovics (Mar 28)