Re: Industry calls on Microsoft to scrap PatchTuesday for Critical flaws

[n3td3v <n3td3v () gmail com>]

Cute, really cute, but still, we've got the same security situation, to
which you haven't so far had enough confidence to comment on.

At least i'm expressing an opinion on a security issue, where as you're just
arguing over aliases and who's got more credibility than who.

Can we get back on topic now?
http://groups.google.com/group/n3td3v/browse_thread/thread/a69861a3d768f39f/59589507866a0738?lnk=raot#59589507866a0738


On 3/28/06, krux <krux702 () gmail com> wrote:
> sigh...
>
> cat <<END >> ~/.procmailrc
> :0 BH
> * n3td3v
> /dev/null
> END
>
>
> On 3/28/06, n3td3v < n3td3v () gmail com> wrote:
> > The problem here is, many of the n3td3v bashers are .... [ blah blah
> > blah ]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/