Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: To XSS or not?


From: "Aaron Gray" <angray () beeb net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:02:50 +0100

how we will measure which one is major and which not ?
major for you is minor for me and vice versa.

Major is an XSS on a well used "major"web site, or a financial based webh
site even if it is a "minor" web site. A "minor" XSS web vulnability is one
on a little known site.
Hope you argee with this definition.

if we agree that XSS are vulns (i personally agree) then they deserve to
be reported. Just look at the subject of the message that report a XSS
and choose to read it or to not read it.

Yes I do, but I think a spcialized list is in order for web vulnabilities.

XSS are based on bad code practices .. some day the programmers will
learn to not make such mistakes if we point them. if we ignore them ....
well security is not based on ignorance.

Yes I need to learn about this area as I am doing a couple of PHP&MySQL
based web sites myself and would like a specialized list to ask Q's on.

Regards,

Aaron

Aaron Gray wrote:
Major ones could still be reported on the other lists.

Aaron

something like xsstraq powered on securityfocus should be cleaner yep :)

Maybe there should be a special XSS list that could specialize in
that area ?

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: