Full Disclosure mailing list archives
WMF Risk Analysis for Win9X anyone ?
From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob () suespammers org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 12:09:50 -0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Did anyone conduct a compreensive risk analysis of the WMF vulnerability for Win9X/ME systems ? ISC analysis is very ambiguous, and MS position on the issue is more on the lines of "we don't want to be bothered". What ARE the real risks (or lack of them) for Win9X/ME systems ? - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob () suespammers org> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDvnoupdyWzQ5b5ckRAs4FAJsGIPcPcS2caby0Bs5mT7iFSqPwsQCfaHKG Nu1Fn18hVb/S/IAq8lw33RE= =gwXC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- WMF Risk Analysis for Win9X anyone ? Rodrigo Barbosa (Jan 06)
- Message not available
- REWMF Risk Analysis for Win9X anyone ? Peter Ferrie (Jan 06)
- Re: REWMF Risk Analysis for Win9X anyone ? Technica Forensis (Jan 06)
- Re: REWMF Risk Analysis for Win9X anyone ? ad () heapoverflow com (Jan 06)
- Re: REWMF Risk Analysis for Win9X anyone ? Rodrigo Barbosa (Jan 06)
- Re: REWMF Risk Analysis for Win9X anyone ? Mark (Jan 07)
- REWMF Risk Analysis for Win9X anyone ? Peter Ferrie (Jan 06)
- Message not available