Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re[2]: [funsec] WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification
From: InfoSecBOFH <infosecbofh () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 04:18:23 -0800
Oh come on Pierre.. you are talking to a reporter here... it is as much of a rootkit as Metasploit is a virus. Again... you are talking to a reporter so it is about as usefull (especially in this case) as talking to you morning dump before you flush. On 1/3/06, Pierre Vandevenne <pierre () datarescue com> wrote:
Good Day, Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 12:59:22 PM, you wrote: GE>> The "patch" by Ilfak Guilfanov works, but by disabling a DLL in Windows. PV>> I wouldn't say it does that. If you really want to simplify it in the LS> extreme, it hides the vulnerable function. LS> Think of it as a "White Hat Rootkit" Or merely a TSR hooking an interrupt vector. It doesn't hide itself. It doesn't allow any kind of remote access to anything. I can't see how it could even be remotely described as a rootkit. -- Best regards, Pierre mailto:pierre () datarescue com
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RE: [funsec] WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification Alex Eckelberry (Jan 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [funsec] WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification InfoSecBOFH (Jan 05)
- Re: Re[2]: [funsec] WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification InfoSecBOFH (Jan 05)