Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Nmap Online
From: merlyn () stonehenge com (Randal L. Schwartz)
Date: 01 Dec 2006 08:33:00 -0800
"Dude" == Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> writes:
Dude> Here is an example of what is legal vs what isnt: If you scan a Dude> machine with nmap from one machine, that is not illegal. If you run Dude> 100,00 nmap scans from a distributed botnet and take down their Dude> server, thats illegal. It's clear you're not a lawyer, and anyone who takes your advice here would be a fool. But I just wanted to point that out again for the clueless. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn () stonehenge com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Nmap Online, (continued)
- Re: Nmap Online Dude VanWinkle (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Randal L. Schwartz (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Dude VanWinkle (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Dude VanWinkle (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Randal L. Schwartz (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Dude VanWinkle (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Michael Holstein (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Jason Miller (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Dude VanWinkle (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Randal L. Schwartz (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Dude VanWinkle (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online David Matousek (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online endrazine (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Ed Carp (Dec 05)
- Re: Nmap Online Greg (Dec 05)
- Re: Nmap Online Richard A Nelson (Dec 05)