Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: FW: SSH Bruteforce blocking script
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 01:05:05 -0400
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 12:24:29 +0800, Michael L Benjamin said:
This does have it's dangers if you are dealing with worms, you might be blocking your own people if they become infected, so an exclusion list is something I'm looking at adding in.
There is something to be said for being a BOFH and blocking them anyhow. That tends to get their attention and make them get it fixed. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RE: SSH Bruteforce blocking script, (continued)
- RE: SSH Bruteforce blocking script Michael L Benjamin (Sep 02)
- Re: SSH Bruteforce blocking script Christoph Moench-Tegeder (Sep 02)
- Re: SSH Bruteforce blocking script Pedro Hugo (Sep 02)
- RE: SSH Bruteforce blocking script Michael L Benjamin (Sep 02)
- Re: SSH Bruteforce blocking script miah (Sep 02)
- RE: SSH Bruteforce blocking script Michael L Benjamin (Sep 04)
- Re: SSH Bruteforce blocking script miah (Sep 06)
- RE: SSH Bruteforce blocking script Ron DuFresne (Sep 06)
- FW: SSH Bruteforce blocking script Michael L Benjamin (Sep 04)
- FW: SSH Bruteforce blocking script Michael L Benjamin (Sep 04)
- Re: FW: SSH Bruteforce blocking script Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 04)
- RE: SSH Bruteforce blocking script Michael L Benjamin (Sep 02)