Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Request to publish your Proof of Concept (esc1.html)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 14:57:26 -0400
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:02:28 +0545, Bipin Gautam said:
WHAT/who is stoping you from rewriting the POC making slight changes in program flow? No that ain't against the law... or is it?
At least under US law, "slight changes" would make the POC a "derivative work", which would be against the law without a suitable license from the original copyright holder - and you can't even use "fair use" to wiggle around this one, as the POC would almost certainly require much more code copying than what "fair use" would cover. What *would* be legal is looking at the original, figuring out how it worked, and then writing a totally new and original POC that utilized the same principle (as only the expression is copyrightable, not the idea expressed). Of course, IANAL, and you'd probably want to ask a competent lawyer specializing in intellectual property if you think the lawyer's answer might matter....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Request to publish your Proof of Concept (esc1.html) Georgi Guninski (Sep 26)
- Re: Re: Request to publish your Proof of Concept (esc1.html) Bipin Gautam (Sep 26)
- Re: Re: Request to publish your Proof of Concept (esc1.html) Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 26)
- Re: Re: Request to publish your Proof of Concept (esc1.html) str0ke (Sep 26)
- RE: Re: Request to publish your Proof of Concept(esc1.html) ad (Sep 26)
- Re: Re: Request to publish your Proof of Concept (esc1.html) Bipin Gautam (Sep 26)