Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue
From: Paul Laudanski <zx () castlecops com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:36:18 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Debasis Mohanty wrote:
Paul,This does not include the version 3.7.159 you are testing.Didn't get the meaning by what you mean by "This does not include". Do u mean whether or not version 3.7.159 is vulnerable it shouldn't be conscidered??
What I'm saying is that the vendor never claimed ZAP versions prior to 5 are not vulnerable in the report. So you're comment is redundant. Simply upgrade your version. Ciao. -- Paul Laudanski, Microsoft MVP Windows-Security CastleCops(SM), http://castlecops.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue Debasis Mohanty (Oct 01)
- Re: Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue Paul Laudanski (Oct 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue Paul Laudanski (Oct 03)
- RE: Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue Paul Laudanski (Oct 03)