Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: IPsecurity theater
From: Joachim Schipper <j.schipper () math uu nl>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:51:27 +0100
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 04:04:31PM -0800, coderman wrote:
On 11/25/05, Joachim Schipper <j.schipper () math uu nl> wrote:... While I'm not too sure what you mean, doesn't manual keying solve this problem?setkey doesn't make the greatest key daemon. something that supports decent authentication for access to key material and provides some form of key scheduling would be nice.
I fully agree. But if you only want to accept traffic from trusted, authenticated sources, it's about as close to that as you can get. If that's not what you meant, which is quite possible as I'm not sure I understood your initial message fully, could you please elaborate on what you want to do? Just shield vulnerable, sucky key daemons from the wide internet? That's doable with something like isakmpd over stunnel, which, come to think of it, is not a bad idea (but, like all of IPsec, probably a bitch to set up). Joachim _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- IPsecurity theater coderman (Nov 25)
- Re: IPsecurity theater Joachim Schipper (Nov 25)
- Re: IPsecurity theater coderman (Nov 25)
- Re: IPsecurity theater Joachim Schipper (Nov 26)
- Re: IPsecurity theater coderman (Nov 26)
- Re: IPsecurity theater Joachim Schipper (Nov 26)
- Re: IPsecurity theater coderman (Nov 25)
- Re: IPsecurity theater Joachim Schipper (Nov 25)